COMMENTS TO: zzzz707@live.com.au
LINK: HOME PAGE JB-GPT's MILITARY AI PROMPTS (Plus how to use these Prompts)
LINK: TO FREE SUBSTACK MAGAZINE JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS MILITARY HISTORY
LINK: JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES
JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—NUCLEAR WEAPONS LIST OF TOPICS
Copyright Notice: This AI-generated research prompt is an original compilation and structured work produced as part of the JB-GPT PROMPTS project. While individual prompts may not qualify for copyright protection under standard AI-generated content rules, the format, structure, curation, and selection of material are protected as a creative compilation. This work may only be used, cited, or reproduced with proper attribution to the JB-GPT PROMPTS project and the source page (www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/ai-warfare). Unauthorised use without acknowledgment is not permitted.
OVERVIEW
The page at https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/nuclear-weapons presents a curated set of AI-generated research prompt papers examining the strategic, historical, ethical, and doctrinal dimensions of Nuclear Weapons. Structured for use in military education, strategic policy analysis, and arms control study, each paper includes:
• A precise title, thematic overview, glossary, key analytical points, and a fully referenced bibliography.
• Source material drawn exclusively from a validated list of nuclear strategy references, ensuring doctrinal coherence and scholarly integrity.
• Prompt templates formatted for seamless use with any AI system, supporting classroom delivery, wargaming scenarios, or staff research functions.
These tools assist commanders, scholars, and analysts in probing the enduring relevance and evolving risks of nuclear deterrence, escalation dynamics, and non-proliferation in contemporary and future conflict environments. They are designed to promote focused inquiry into the realities and challenges of the nuclear era.
Overview: The UN Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), opened for signature in 1968 and entering into force in 1970, is a cornerstone of global nuclear arms control. Its primary objectives are threefold: non-proliferation, disarmament, and the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
Under the treaty, five recognised nuclear-weapon states (United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom) commit not to transfer nuclear weapons or assist non-nuclear-weapon states in acquiring them. In return, non-nuclear states agree not to pursue nuclear weapons, while being assured access to peaceful nuclear technology under international safeguards. Article VI of the NPT also binds all parties to pursue negotiations in good faith towards nuclear disarmament.
The NPT is reviewed every five years at Review Conferences, where compliance and progress are assessed. Despite its near-universal membership (191 states), the treaty faces challenges, including perceived slow disarmament by nuclear powers, non-signatories like India, Israel, and Pakistan developing nuclear weapons, and concerns over nuclear energy programmes potentially serving as cover for weapons development.
Nevertheless, the NPT remains a central pillar of global efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation and promote stability through legal and diplomatic norms.
INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED WITH EACH PROMPT ARE AS FOLLOWS:
***************************************************
SELECT ALL AND COPY EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE. PASTE IT INTO THE INPUT BOX OF THE AI OF YOUR CHOICE.
After pasting, you may use the example questions below or delete them and replace them with your own questions.
Example Questions:
Q1: Please provide some examples of follow-up questions that I can ask this AI.
Q2: Please provide a more detailed explanation of key point number ____.
Feel free to disagree with the AI’s answer. Challenge it. An AI's response should be considered one stage in the learning process—not the final word.
Note: You may, if you wish, remove the restriction that requires the AI to limit itself to the approved bibliography.
—————————————————
INSTRUCTIONS TO AI:
LEAVE IN OR DELETE THE FOLLOWING—YOUR CHOICE:
FOR THIS QUESTION, THE AI CAN USE ANY RESOURCES TO WHICH IT HAS ACCESS. IT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
01. Use this AI prompt to answer the above question(s).
02. Everything must be supported by references sourced either from the prompt or from the following:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
03. You are to use the extensive approved references when answering questions.
04. Your output must include:
Five to ten key numbered points, each in its own paragraph.
Each key point must be supported by a specific reference, including book title and chapter number.
Include a full, separate Harvard-style bibliography at the end of your response.
Each bibliography entry must appear in a separate paragraph and follow consistent formatting.
Provide a minimum of five references drawn from the prompt or from the approved reference list:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
Do not include summaries, definitions, or commentary.
***************************************************
Definition – Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear weapons are explosive devices that derive their destructive force from nuclear reactions—either fission (atomic bombs) or a combination of fission and fusion (thermonuclear or hydrogen bombs). These weapons produce enormous blast energy, intense heat, and radiation effects, making them uniquely devastating tools of war with profound strategic, political, and ethical implications.
Definition – Tactical vs. Strategic Nuclear Weapons
Tactical Nuclear Weapons are low- to medium-yield nuclear arms designed for battlefield use against military targets. Their delivery systems typically include short-range missiles, artillery shells, or aircraft-dropped bombs, and they are intended to achieve limited military objectives without necessarily escalating to full-scale nuclear war.
Strategic Nuclear Weapons are high-yield weapons designed for long-range delivery—via intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), or heavy bombers—targeting an adversary’s critical infrastructure, cities, or nuclear forces. These weapons are central to deterrence doctrine and are structured to influence state-level strategic calculations, not just battlefield outcomes.
The core difference lies in range, yield, and purpose: tactical for localized military use and strategic for overarching national-level deterrence and retaliation.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS LIST OF PROMPTS
Pre-1939: Nuclear Power: What is it... Nuclear Weapons: What are they?
1939: Einstein–Szilárd Letter and the Nazi Nuclear Threat
1939–1941: Initial U.S. Government Nuclear Research
1941: The MAUD Report and British Influence on U.S. Policy
1942: Establishment of the Manhattan Project
1942–1945: Uranium Enrichment at Oak Ridge
1943–1945: Role of Los Alamos in Bomb Development
1942–1945: General Leslie Groves and Manhattan Project Oversight
1943–1945: J. Robert Oppenheimer and Theoretical Bomb Design
1944–1945: Development of the B-29 as a Nuclear Delivery Platform
July 16, 1945: Trinity Test – First Nuclear Detonation
July–August 1945: Decision to Use Nuclear Weapons on Japan
August 6, 1945: Bombing of Hiroshima – Operational and Strategic Impact
August 9, 1945: Bombing of Nagasaki – Tactical Decisions and Consequences
August 1945: Japanese Surrender and Role of Atomic Bombs
1945: Global Reactions to U.S. Nuclear Use
1945–1949: Soviet Atomic Program and Intelligence Acquisition
1946: The Baruch Plan – Early Arms Control Proposal
1946: Operation Crossroads – First U.S. Postwar Nuclear Tests
1946–Present: Role of the United Nations in Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation
1946–1960s: Establishment and Expansion of Strategic Air Command
August 1949: Soviet Union’s First Atomic Bomb Test
1950–1952: U.S. Hydrogen Bomb Development Program
November 1952: Ivy Mike – First Thermonuclear Explosion
August 1953: Soviet Thermonuclear Test and Strategic Response
1952–1960: British and French Nuclear Weapons Development
1950s–1980s: NATO Nuclear Doctrine and Deterrence Strategy
October 1962: Cuban Missile Crisis and Nuclear Brinkmanship
1968: Signing of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
1968–Present: The NPT and Compliance Challenges
October 1964: China’s First Nuclear Test
1970s: Introduction of MIRVs and Strategic Warhead Dispersal
1970s–1998: Pakistan’s Nuclear Program – The A.Q. Khan Network and Diaspora Support
1972: SALT I and the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty
May 1974: India’s First Nuclear Test – “Smiling Buddha”
1974–1998: Israel’s Covert Nuclear Weapons Program – Origins and Strategic Ambiguity
1979: SALT II and U.S.–Soviet Strategic Debate
1980s–Present: Iran’s Nuclear Program – Peaceful Intentions or Weaponization?
1983: Strategic Defense Initiative – “Star Wars” Concept
November 1983: Able Archer and Nuclear Misperception Risk
1987: INF Treaty – Elimination of Intermediate Nuclear Forces
1991: Collapse of the Soviet Union and Nuclear Security Concerns
1991: START I Treaty – Strategic Arms Reduction
191–1994: Ukraine’s Post-Soviet Nuclear Inheritance and the 1994 Budapest Memorandum
1994–2020s: North Korea’s Nuclear Development – From Agreed Framework to ICBM Threat
1998: Indian and Pakistani Nuclear Tests – Deterrence and Escalation in South Asia
2014–Present: Ukraine’s Security Dilemma – Nuclear Disarmament and Russian Aggression
2015: Iran Nuclear Deal – Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)
Post-2018: Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons in U.S. Policy
2020s: Russian Nuclear Modernization and Escalatory Doctrine
2020s: Expansion of Chinese Strategic Nuclear Arsenal
2020s: Hypersonic Missiles and Nuclear Delivery Innovation
2020s: Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Command and Control
2020s: Cybersecurity Threats to Nuclear Warning and C3 Systems
2021–2026: Future of START and Strategic Arms Control
2020s: The Erosion of the Global Non-Proliferation Regime in a Multipolar World
Ongoing: Humanitarian and Ethical Challenges of Nuclear Weapons Use
2025 June: Iran’s Nuclear Calculus in Light of Regional Realities