COMMENTS TO: zzzz707@live.com.au

LINK:  HOME PAGE JB-GPT's MILITARY AI PROMPTS (Plus how to use these Prompts)

LINK: TO FREE SUBSTACK MAGAZINE  JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS MILITARY HISTORY  

LINK: JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES 

LINK: JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—HISTORY OF DRONE WARFARE

***************************************************

SELECT ALL AND COPY EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE. PASTE IT INTO THE INPUT BOX OF THE AI OF YOUR CHOICE.

After pasting, you may use the example questions below or delete them and replace them with your own questions.

Example Questions:
Q1: Please provide some examples of follow-up questions that I can ask this AI.
Q2: Please provide a more detailed explanation of key point number ____.

Feel free to disagree with the AI’s answer. Challenge it. An AI's response should be considered one stage in the learning process—not the final word.

Note: You may, if you wish, remove the restriction that requires the AI to limit itself to the approved bibliography.

—————————————————

INSTRUCTIONS TO AI:

LEAVE IN OR DELETE THE FOLLOWING—YOUR CHOICE:
FOR THIS QUESTION, THE AI CAN USE ANY RESOURCES TO WHICH IT HAS ACCESS. IT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
01. Use this AI prompt to answer the above question(s).
02. Everything must be supported by references sourced either from the prompt or from the following:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
03. You are to use the extensive approved references when answering questions.
04. Your output must include:

• Five to ten key numbered points, each in its own paragraph.

• Each key point must be supported by a specific reference, including book title and chapter number.

• Include a full, separate Harvard-style bibliography at the end of your response.

• Each bibliography entry must appear in a separate paragraph and follow consistent formatting.

• Provide a minimum of five references drawn from the prompt or from the approved reference list:
  https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references

5. Do not include summaries, definitions, or commentary.

***************************************************

DEFINITION: DRONE.....“The term ‘drone’ broadly encompasses uncrewed systems that operate across various domains—including air, land, sea, underwater, and even space—capable of remote control or autonomous function. These systems, whether flying aircraft, ground rovers, or maritime vessels, are designed to perform military, surveillance, logistical, or civilian tasks without an onboard human presence.”— De Gruyter Handbook of Drone Warfare (Rogers, 2024, Ch. 3: "Defining Drones"). 

1942: Goliath and the Evolution of German Remote-Controlled Warfare
How technological innovation shaped unmanned battlefield strategy

OVERVIEW
The Goliath tracked mine (Sd.Kfz. 302), deployed by Germany in 1942, was an early example of unmanned ground vehicle warfare. Designed to breach fortifications, destroy tanks, and demolish infrastructure, it was remotely guided via a cable system by an operator from a safe distance. Although it represented a novel approach to battlefield automation, the Goliath proved tactically limited due to its vulnerability, restricted range, and high production cost. This prompt explores the context, operational use, and legacy of this pioneering device, situating it within broader technological trends of the Second World War. By examining the Goliath’s development and deployment, the aim is to inform further inquiry into early military robotics and their strategic implications.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

1. Goliath: A small German tracked demolition vehicle introduced in 1942, remotely controlled via a cable and packed with explosives.

2. Sd.Kfz. 302: The designation for the original Goliath model, powered by electric motors.

3. Remote-Controlled Demolition Vehicle: A machine operated from a distance for the purpose of destroying enemy positions or materiel.

4. Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV): A military platform designed to operate on the ground without an onboard human presence.

5. Wehrmacht: The unified armed forces of Nazi Germany, comprising the Heer, Kriegsmarine, and Luftwaffe.

6. Demolition Charge: An explosive payload used to damage or destroy buildings, vehicles, or enemy fortifications.

7. Armour Breaching: The act of overcoming or penetrating enemy defensive structures using mechanical or explosive force.

8. Battlefield Innovation: The introduction of new tactics or technologies to gain an advantage in combat scenarios.

9. Cable-Guided System: A remote-control mechanism using wires to transmit operator commands to a device.

10. Tactical Utility: The effectiveness or suitability of a system in achieving battlefield objectives.

KEY POINTS

1. Origins in German Demolition Strategy: The Goliath was created in response to the Wehrmacht’s need for a safe, remote method of breaching enemy defenses. Its development reflected growing interest in reducing battlefield risk to personnel using technology-based solutions. Supported by: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 8.

2. Sd.Kfz. 302 Specifications and Functionality: The first Goliath model used electric motors, had a 60 kg explosive payload, and relied on a 650-meter control cable. This made it a pioneering yet mechanically limited system. Supported by: Overy, 2023, Ch. 11.

3. Tactical Intent vs. Operational Reality: Despite its intended versatility, the Goliath was rarely successful in combat due to vulnerability to gunfire, poor terrain performance, and cable limitations. Supported by: Murray & Millett, 2000, Ch. 12.

4. Deployment on Multiple Fronts: Goliaths were used in urban combat scenarios such as Warsaw in 1944 and during the Normandy invasion, where they had mixed and mostly negligible success. Supported by: Beevor, 2012, Ch. 23.

5. Influence on Post-War Robotics and Military UGVs: The Goliath set a precedent for unmanned ground vehicles and influenced post-WWII military research into remote-controlled systems. Supported by: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 8.

6. Resource Constraints and Strategic Misfit: With Germany’s war economy under strain, the cost-effectiveness of the Goliath was questionable, making it a poor allocation of scarce materials. Supported by: Tooze, 2006, Ch. 14.

7. Comparison with Allied Approaches: While Germany explored remote demolition vehicles, the Allies focused on traditional engineer units and sappers, showing divergent approaches to battlefield innovation. Supported by: Mawdsley, 2020, Ch. 13.

8. Cable-Guidance Vulnerabilities: The reliance on physical cable made the Goliath highly susceptible to disconnection, whether through enemy action or environmental hazards. Supported by: Weinberg, 1994, Ch. 15.

9. Psychological Warfare Impact: Though not tactically decisive, Goliaths occasionally frightened Allied troops unfamiliar with remote-controlled explosive threats. Supported by: Roberts, 2009, Ch. 12.

10. Industrial Challenges in Production: Manufacturing the Goliath required dedicated components, contributing to its limited production and deployment given the competing demands of Germany’s armament priorities. Supported by: Overy, 2023, Ch. 11.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Overy, R. (ed.) (2023) The Oxford History of World War II. Ch. 11: "Technology and War" — Coverage of German battlefield technologies including Goliath.

2. O’Brien, P.P. (2015) How the War Was Won: Air–Sea Power and Allied Victory in World War II. Ch. 8 — Analysis of technological innovation and Germany’s attempts at remote warfare.

3. Tooze, A. (2006) The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy. Ch. 14 — Examination of Germany’s production challenges and use of advanced but inefficient weapons.

4. Murray, W. & Millett, A.R. (2000) A War to Be Won: Fighting the Second World War. Ch. 12 — Strategic evaluation of the effectiveness of German weapons.

5. Beevor, A. (2012) The Second World War. Ch. 23 — Description of German weapons and their role in late-war engagements.

6. Weinberg, G.L. (1994) A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II. Ch. 15 — Discussion of late-war German technological deployment.

7. Roberts, A. (2009) The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War. Ch. 12 — Psychological and tactical effects of unconventional German weaponry.

8. Mawdsley, E. (2020) World War II: A New History, Second Edition. Ch. 13 — Comparative overview of German and Allied battlefield technologies.