AIR POWER 69: JB-GPT’s AI PROMPT DEEP SEARCH—2000s–2020s: Complexity in Training for Advanced Combat Air Systems

***************************************************

SELECT ALL AND COPY EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE. PASTE IT INTO THE INPUT BOX OF THE AI OF YOUR CHOICE.

After pasting, you may use the example questions below or delete them and replace them with your own questions.

Example Questions:
Q1: Please provide some examples of follow-up questions that I can ask this AI.
Q2: Please provide a more detailed explanation of key point number ____.

Feel free to disagree with the AI’s answer. Challenge it. An AI's response should be considered one stage in the learning process—not the final word.

Note: You may, if you wish, remove the restriction that requires the AI to limit itself to the approved bibliography.

—————————————————

INSTRUCTIONS TO AI:

LEAVE IN OR DELETE THE FOLLOWING—YOUR CHOICE:
FOR THIS QUESTION, THE AI CAN USE ANY RESOURCES TO WHICH IT HAS ACCESS. IT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
01. Use this AI prompt to answer the above question(s).
02. Everything must be supported by references sourced either from the prompt or from the following:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
03. You are to use the extensive approved references when answering questions.
04. Your output must include:

Five to ten key numbered points, each in its own paragraph.
Each key point must be supported by a specific reference, including book title and chapter number.
Include a full, separate Harvard-style bibliography at the end of your response.
Each bibliography entry must appear in a separate paragraph and follow consistent formatting.
Provide a minimum of five references drawn from the prompt or from the approved reference list:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references

Do not include summaries, definitions, or commentary.

***************************************************

2000s–2020s: Complexity in Training for Advanced Combat Air Systems

How aircraft complexity since 2000 has reshaped force preparation and readiness paradigms across the air domain

Overview
Since the early 2000s, the evolution of fifth-generation aircraft has significantly altered the landscape of aircrew and maintenance training across modern air forces. Platforms such as the F-22, F-35, and networked ISR and EW assets demand training that is not only technically robust but also cognitively intensive. As the systems have grown more integrated and software-defined, traditional boundaries between operational and technical training have blurred. Consequently, air forces like the RAAF, USAF, and RAF have had to innovate training pipelines, invest in simulation, and rethink sustainment concepts to maintain operational readiness. This transformation in training philosophy, scope, and delivery is a central feature of contemporary air power capability.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Fifth-Generation Aircraft: Stealth-capable, sensor-fused, network-centric aircraft (e.g., F-35, F-22).
Aircrew Training Transformation: Changes to training systems to meet the cognitive and procedural demands of advanced aircraft.
Mission Systems: Integrated avionics and combat systems that require specific training beyond flying skills.
Synthetic Training Environment (STE): Virtual and augmented reality tools used to replicate high-threat, multi-domain scenarios.
Maintenance Workforce Integration: The increasing technical burden on support crews necessitating greater digital fluency.
Distributed Mission Training (DMT): Networked simulators used for joint and coalition virtual training.
Cognitive Load: Mental demand placed on aircrew due to complex system interaction.
Integrated Logistics Support (ILS): A lifecycle approach to maintenance planning from system acquisition onwards.
Air Power Doctrine: Authoritative guidance on the employment of air forces, adapting to technological advancement.
Training Pipeline: The structured path from recruitment to operational readiness for aircrew and maintainers.

KEY POINTS

The Rise of Cognitive Aircrew Training Requirements
Fifth-gen platforms like the F-35 require aircrew to synthesize vast amounts of sensor data in real time. The challenge lies in training decision-making, not just system operation. This has necessitated new curriculum design centered on situational awareness and information management.
Simulation as a Training Cornerstone
High-fidelity simulators and STE have become critical due to the cost and complexity of live-flying fifth-gen aircraft. USAF and RAAF training programs now embed simulation as a primary rather than supplementary method.
Integrated Aircrew and Maintenance Training
The boundary between operator and maintainer has blurred. The F-35's Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) introduced the need for maintainers to understand software ecosystems, not just hardware.
Training for Multi-Domain Integration
Aircrew and support personnel now train for joint and combined operations from day one, reflecting the integration of cyber, space, and ground elements into air operations.
Evolving Doctrine Shapes Training Philosophy
Modern ADF and USAF doctrine emphasizes agility and adaptability. Training programs now inculcate mission command principles—training judgment, not rote action.
Lifecycle Training and Requalification
Fifth-gen systems evolve via software upgrades. This requires continuous retraining across both flying and support roles—creating a “never fully qualified” learning environment.
Coalition Interoperability Demands
Training systems increasingly prepare aircrew for coalition operations using DMT. NATO and Five Eyes nations align TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, Procedures) through joint virtual environments.
Training Support for Sovereign Sustainment
Australia’s AIR 6000 program emphasized building national training capacity to ensure sovereignty over F-35 operations and maintenance, fostering local expertise and reducing reliance on U.S. systems.
Synthetic and Live Training Balance
Maintaining a balance between virtual and live training is critical. Live flying still provides human performance insight and stress conditioning that simulation cannot fully replicate.
Logistics and Sustainment Training Revolution
Modern logistics require “train the system” approaches—support teams are trained using digital twins and predictive maintenance tools aligned with OEM cycles.
Psychophysiological Resilience Training
Complex aircraft systems increase operator stress and cognitive load. Forces like the USAF now include neurocognitive monitoring and resilience training as part of the aircrew syllabus.
Support Force Digitization
Support roles, especially avionics and mission data specialists, are undergoing digital transformation. This includes AI-enabled diagnostics and network maintenance systems training.
Doctrine-Driven Simulation Requirements
Doctrine now drives simulator specification—requiring threat-representative systems to simulate near-peer combat, ISR denial environments, and EW challenges.
Challenges of Skill Retention
Rapid obsolescence of systems and the compressed training-to-readiness cycle pose challenges for skill sustainment, especially in small air forces like the RAAF.
Training for Strategic Effects, Not Just Tactical Execution
Aircrew are increasingly trained to understand the strategic impact of tactical missions—integrating targeting, ISR, and influence operations into their skillsets.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ADF-I-3 ADF Air Power – Edition 1 (2023)
Military Strategy, Joint Operations, and Airpower – Burke, Fowler, Matisek (2022)
Tactical Air Power and the Vietnam War – Phil Haun (2024)
The Icarus Syndrome – Carl H. Builder (1994)
RAF: A Centenary of Operations – Michael Napier (2018)
Operation Allied Force: NATO’s Airpower Victory – Brian Laslie (2024)
Sustaining the Carrier War – Stan Fisher (2023)

Also consult JB-GPT’s Air Power Bibliography:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/AP-BIBLIOGRAPHY

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse