COMMENTS TO: zzzz707@live.com.au
LINK: HOME PAGE JB-GPT's MILITARY AI PROMPTS (Plus how to use these Prompts)
LINK: TO FREE SUBSTACK MAGAZINE JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS MILITARY HISTORY
LINK: JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES
AIR POWER: JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—AIR POWER STUDIES 1903 – 2025.
SELECT ALL AND COPY EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE. PASTE IT INTO THE INPUT BOX OF THE AI OF YOUR CHOICE.
After pasting, you may use the example questions below or delete them and replace them with your own questions.
Example Questions:
Q1: Please provide some examples of follow-up questions that I can ask this AI.
Q2: Please provide a more detailed explanation of key point number ____.
Feel free to disagree with the AI’s answer. Challenge it. An AI's response should be considered one stage in the learning process—not the final word.
Note: You may, if you wish, remove the restriction that requires the AI to limit itself to the approved bibliography.
—————————————————
INSTRUCTIONS TO AI:
LEAVE IN OR DELETE THE FOLLOWING—YOUR CHOICE:
FOR THIS QUESTION, THE AI CAN USE ANY RESOURCES TO WHICH IT HAS ACCESS. IT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
01. Use this AI prompt to answer the above question(s).
02. Everything must be supported by references sourced either from the prompt or from the following:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
03. You are to use the extensive approved references when answering questions.
04. Your output must include:
Five to ten key numbered points, each in its own paragraph.
Each key point must be supported by a specific reference, including book title and chapter number.
Include a full, separate Harvard-style bibliography at the end of your response.
Each bibliography entry must appear in a separate paragraph and follow consistent formatting.
Provide a minimum of five references drawn from the prompt or from the approved reference list:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
Do not include summaries, definitions, or commentary.
MODERN AIRPOWER EDUCATION AND DOCTRINE
How technological advancements shape multinational and joint force doctrine
The modern evolution of airpower education and joint doctrine reflects a shift from national-centric strategies to a globally interoperable, networked, and adaptable force. Modern air forces are increasingly expected to operate in multinational environments, necessitating shared doctrinal frameworks and standardized education among allies. Technological transformation, including digital networks, AI integration, and complex joint warfare capabilities, demands a reconfiguration of military education to emphasize joint, interagency, and multinational perspectives from the pre-commissioning stage onwards. Institutions like the USAF Academy and ADF’s Air and Space Power Centre now embed joint doctrine, strategic thinking, and interoperability concepts into professional military education. This shift ensures preparedness for dynamic and contested operational environments, highlighting education as a strategic enabler of joint effectiveness and mission success.
ICLOs – Institutional Competency Learning Outcomes
CJCS – Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
JFACC – Joint Force Air Component Commander
Multinational Interoperability – Operational effectiveness between allied forces
Joint Doctrine – Integrated operational concepts guiding multi-service collaboration
Defence Mastery – ADF concept focusing on applied operational judgment and integration
Air-Land Forces Application Agency – U.S. inter-service doctrinal body
ASPC – Air and Space Power Centre (Australia)
Adaptive Basing – Flexible infrastructure deployment in contested environments
Red Flag – USAF joint and multinational air combat training exercise
Exercise PITCH BLACK – ADF-led multinational air combat exercise
Joint Planning – Unified strategy development among service branches
Combat Cloud – Distributed command and control network
Operational Art – Link between strategic objectives and tactical actions
Strategic Airpower – Air operations aimed at national-level strategic effects
1. Joint Education Mandates in Precommissioning Training
CJCS policy mandates joint education across all officer commissioning sources. USAF Instruction 36-2014 aligns these with ICLOs, ensuring foundational understanding of strategic and operational art within joint and multinational environments.
2. Integration of Air Power in Joint Doctrine
The ADF and USAF emphasize doctrinal integration of air power into joint planning frameworks. This integration spans across air-land, air-maritime, and air-cyber domains to optimize operational effectiveness.
3. Defence Mastery and Professional Air Education
Air power professionals must develop "Defence mastery," encompassing critical thinking and strategic judgement. The ADF’s ASPC sponsors advanced education, staff college placements, and research opportunities to shape adaptable leaders.
4. The Role of Exercises in Joint Preparedness
Exercises such as Red Flag (USAF) and Exercise PITCH BLACK (ADF) provide environments to rehearse joint and multinational doctrines, refine interoperability, and develop shared tactics and procedures.
5. Evolution of Doctrinal Institutions Post-Vietnam
USAF’s doctrinal reforms post-Vietnam, including the Air-Land Forces Application Agency and the “31 Initiatives,” formalized the operational integration of air and ground forces under a shared conceptual framework.
6. Strategic Curriculum for Airpower Professionals
Olsen argues that air strategists must be educated in history, philosophy, and fiction to grasp the complexities of modern warfare, enabling them to operate effectively in joint and multinational contexts.
7. Multinational Force Education for Interoperability
Foreign staff college placements support the development of shared operational understanding and trust among coalition airpower professionals, a foundation for multinational command success.
8. Airmindedness as a Cognitive Framework
Modern doctrine incorporates the concept of “airmindedness”—a cognitive approach blending technical skill with strategic awareness to optimize decision-making in complex, joint environments.
9. Technological Integration into Joint Force Structures
Digital networks such as the USAF’s Combat Cloud facilitate distributed command structures, allowing for more dynamic and integrated airpower employment across multinational forces.
10. Adaptive Education for Emerging Threats
Military education frameworks increasingly shift from prescriptive doctrine to adaptive learning, preparing personnel for uncertainty, irregular threats, and emerging domains like cyber and space.
11. Context-Theory-Application Paradigm
USAF curricula embed a contextual approach to understanding warfare, linking historical and theoretical foundations to practical applications across joint and multinational operations.
12. Integrated Force Generation and Sustainment
Both USAF and ADF emphasize the integration of force generation and sustainment processes into joint frameworks, ensuring readiness for rapid multinational deployments.
13. Emphasis on Strategic Thinking in Operational Roles
Airpower officers are trained not just in tactical proficiency but in strategic thinking, capable of leading multinational missions and navigating global security complexities.
14. Interoperability as a Strategic Priority
Interoperability, grounded in compatible systems, shared training, and joint doctrine, is central to coalition success in modern conflicts.
15. Distributed Command Models and Combat Networks
The movement toward distributed operations and combat networks reflects an adaptive approach to future air warfare, requiring doctrinal evolution and educational transformation.
Burke, R., Fowler, M., & Matisek, J. (2022) Military Strategy, Joint Operations, and Airpower.
Ch. 1: "Joint Education and Officer Development" — U.S. doctrine on joint PME and commissioning education.
Ch. 14: "Theory, Doctrine, and Application of Strategic Air War" — Historical grounding of strategic airpower.
Olsen, J.A. (2017) Airpower Applied: U.S., NATO, and Israeli Combat Experience.
Ch. 9: "Education of the Airpower Professional" — Air strategy education and multinational integration.
Ch. 6–7: Post-Vietnam doctrine, Air-Land Forces Application agency, NATO initiatives.
ADF (2023) Air Power 2023.
Ch. 3: "Integrating Air Power" — Defence mastery, career-long education, multinational interoperability.
Ch. 4: "Employing Air Power" — Joint and adaptive operational doctrine, exercises, and readiness.
ADF (2023) Summary Air Power Update 2023.
Ch. 1–3: Air power capabilities, integration across national and multinational frameworks.