LINK: JB-GPT's MILITARY AI PROMPTS Comments to: zzzz707@live.com.au

***************************************************

SELECT ALL AND COPY EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE. PASTE IT INTO THE INPUT BOX OF THE AI OF YOUR CHOICE.

After pasting, you may use the example questions below or delete them and replace them with your own questions.

Example Questions:
Q1: Please provide some examples of follow-up questions that I can ask this AI.
Q2: Please provide a more detailed explanation of key point number ____.

Feel free to disagree with the AI’s answer. Challenge it. An AI's response should be considered one stage in the learning process—not the final word.

Note: You may, if you wish, remove the restriction that requires the AI to limit itself to the approved bibliography.

—————————————————

INSTRUCTIONS TO AI:

LEAVE IN OR DELETE THE FOLLOWING—YOUR CHOICE:
FOR THIS QUESTION, THE AI CAN USE ANY RESOURCES TO WHICH IT HAS ACCESS. IT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
01. Use this AI prompt to answer the above question(s).
02. Everything must be supported by references sourced either from the prompt or from the following:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
03. You are to use the extensive approved references when answering questions.
04. Your output must include:

• Five to ten key numbered points, each in its own paragraph.

• Each key point must be supported by a specific reference, including book title and chapter number.

• Include a full, separate Harvard-style bibliography at the end of your response.

• Each bibliography entry must appear in a separate paragraph and follow consistent formatting.

• Provide a minimum of five references drawn from the prompt or from the approved reference list:
  https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references

5. Do not include summaries, definitions, or commentary.

***************************************************

1917: TRENCHARD BACKS STRATEGIC BOMBING FORCE.

OVERVIEW 

In 1917, amid the harsh realities of trench warfare and escalating air losses, Major-General Hugh Trenchard began to articulate a revolutionary concept: air power should not merely support ground troops—it should pursue its own strategic objectives, especially through bombing vital enemy infrastructure. Trenchard’s early advocacy for strategic bombing and a separate air force placed him among the most influential air power theorists of the 20th century. His vision laid groundwork for the formation of the Royal Air Force (RAF) in 1918 and shaped British air doctrine for decades. Despite technological limitations, Trenchard’s principles—autonomy, offense, and morale targeting—remain foundational in modern strategic air theory.

GLOSSARY

01.   Hugh Trenchard: British military officer known as the “Father of the Royal Air Force” and a pioneer of strategic bombing theory.
02.   Strategic Bombing: The use of air power to destroy an enemy’s industrial and civilian infrastructure to weaken its war effort.
03.   Independent Air Force: A separate air service not subordinate to army or navy command, capable of conducting autonomous operations.
04.   RFC (Royal Flying Corps): British Army’s air arm before it merged with the RNAS to form the RAF in 1918.
05.   Air Superiority: The condition in which one force dominates the airspace and prevents effective enemy operations.
06.   Morale Bombing: Targeting civilian populations or institutions to break the enemy’s will to resist.
07.   Bloody April (1917): A period of heavy British aerial losses during WWI that spurred calls for reform and innovation.
08.   Douhet Theory: A model advocating decisive victory through air power alone, influencing Trenchard’s thinking.
09.   RFC IX Brigade: A dedicated British long-range bombing unit under Trenchard's command during late WWI.
10.   Combined Arms Doctrine: Coordination of different military branches—Trenchard often resisted subordinating air power to land forces.

KEY POINTS

01.   Trenchard’s 1917 Vision Was Doctrinally Revolutionary
As commander of the Royal Flying Corps in France, Trenchard began promoting the idea that air power should operate independently from ground strategy, capable of striking directly at enemy war-making capacity far behind the lines. This contradicted prevailing beliefs that aviation was mainly a support tool for reconnaissance and artillery spotting.

02.   Strategic Bombing Emerged from the RFC’s Limitations
Trenchard recognized the psychological and infrastructural effects of bombing German factories, rail hubs, and cities. By forming long-range units like IX Brigade in 1917, he institutionalized the concept of striking beyond the battlefield—seeding the notion that air campaigns could determine the outcome of war.

03.   Bloody April 1917 Prompted Tactical and Strategic Rethink
The loss of nearly 250 British aircraft in April 1917 highlighted the need for better doctrine, tactics, and technological parity. Rather than shrink back, Trenchard doubled down on offense, arguing that only sustained aerial aggression could achieve morale and material dominance.

04.   Morale Bombing Reflected a Broader Psychological Theory of War
Trenchard believed attacking civilian morale could hasten victory. He viewed industrial workers, transport networks, and urban populations as valid targets—precursors to later WWII-era RAF campaigns. His emphasis on psychological effects influenced future air strategists like Arthur Harris.

05.   Air Autonomy Advocated Before RAF Existed
Even before the RAF was created in April 1918, Trenchard pushed for an air force independent from army or navy control. He feared subordination would limit strategic innovation and advocated for equal status in joint planning, a radical notion for the time.

06.   Operational Experience Shaped His Strategic Ideas
Trenchard’s experiences in command during the Battle of the Somme and Cambrai illustrated the limited efficacy of tactical air support alone. These campaigns pushed him to conceive air power as a strategic force with its own campaign objectives—not just an adjunct to land battles.

07.   Trenchard Rejected Defensive Postures in Air Doctrine
Trenchard’s doctrine stressed continual offensive operations to deny the enemy initiative. This “attack is the best defense” mantra became central to RAF culture and influenced Cold War doctrines that prioritized deterrence through offensive air capability.

08.   His Legacy Extended Beyond WWI
Trenchard became the RAF’s first Chief of the Air Staff and later headed the Imperial General Staff. His advocacy ensured that strategic bombing became central to British air planning from the interwar years through WWII, cementing his long-term influence.

09.   Trenchard’s Ideas Often Faced Resistance
Critics in the army viewed his theories as impractical or morally dubious. Yet Trenchard persisted, developing officer education, institutional doctrine, and public rhetoric that framed the air force as a decisive and modern military tool.

10.   Strategic Bombing’s Mixed Success in WWI Did Not Deter Him
Despite minimal tactical effect due to technical limitations in aircraft payload and accuracy, Trenchard argued the psychological and systemic impact of even rudimentary bombing validated the concept. His persistence ensured the RAF would continue developing this capability.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

01.   Biddle, T.D. (2002) Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and American Ideas about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chapter: Early Strategic Bombing Concepts
02.   Corum, J.S. (2022) Bloody April 1917: The Birth of Modern Air Power. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. Chapter: RFC and Strategic Lessons
03.   Olsen, J.A. (ed.) (2010) A History of Air Warfare. Washington, DC: Potomac Books. Chapter: WWI Air Power
04.   Olsen, J.A. (ed.) (2013) Air Commanders. Washington, DC: Potomac Books. Chapter: Hugh Trenchard
05.   Meilinger, P.S. (2001) Airwar: Theory and Practice. London: Frank Cass. Chapter: Origins of Strategic Theory
06.   Hippler, T. (2013) Bombing the People: Giulio Douhet and the Foundations of Air-Power Strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter: Interwar Influences on Trenchard
07.   Builder, C.H. (1989) The Icarus Syndrome. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Chapter: Institutional Doctrine