COMMENTS TO: zzzz707@live.com.au

LINK:  HOME PAGE JB-GPT's MILITARY AI PROMPTS (Plus how to use these Prompts)

LINK: TO FREE SUBSTACK MAGAZINE  JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS MILITARY HISTORY  

LINK: JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—MASTER BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES 

JB-GPT's AI PROMPTS DEEP SEARCH—MILITARY BOOKS HOME PAGE

***************************************************

SELECT ALL AND COPY EVERYTHING ON THIS PAGE. PASTE IT INTO THE INPUT BOX OF THE AI OF YOUR CHOICE.

After pasting, you may use the example questions below or delete them and replace them with your own questions.

Example Questions:
Q1: Please provide some examples of follow-up questions that I can ask this AI.
Q2: Please provide a more detailed explanation of key point number ____.

Feel free to disagree with the AI’s answer. Challenge it. An AI's response should be considered one stage in the learning process—not the final word.

Note: You may, if you wish, remove the restriction that requires the AI to limit itself to the approved bibliography.

—————————————————

INSTRUCTIONS TO AI:

LEAVE IN OR DELETE THE FOLLOWING—YOUR CHOICE:
FOR THIS QUESTION, THE AI CAN USE ANY RESOURCES TO WHICH IT HAS ACCESS. IT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE APPROVED BIBLIOGRAPHY.
01. Use this AI prompt to answer the above question(s).
02. Everything must be supported by references sourced either from the prompt or from the following:
https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
03. You are to use the extensive approved references when answering questions.
04. Your output must include:

• Five to ten key numbered points, each in its own paragraph.

• Each key point must be supported by a specific reference, including book title and chapter number.

• Include a full, separate Harvard-style bibliography at the end of your response.

• Each bibliography entry must appear in a separate paragraph and follow consistent formatting.

• Provide a minimum of five references drawn from the prompt or from the approved reference list:
  https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references

5. Do not include summaries, definitions, or commentary.

***************************************************

BOOK: Phillips Payson O’Brien’s  How the War Was Won (2015)
Subtitle: How Technological Advancements in Air–Sea Power Crushed Axis Logistics and Strategy

OVERVIEW

Phillips Payson O’Brien’s How the War Was Won (2015) presents a radical reinterpretation of Allied victory in World War II. Contrary to traditional land-centric views, O’Brien argues that air–sea power—particularly its role in equipment destruction, resource denial, and mobility control—was decisive. Rather than winning through major land battles such as Stalingrad or El Alamein, the Allies dismantled the Axis war machines through strategic bombing, naval blockade, and technological superiority in aviation and maritime industries. O’Brien meticulously traces how the air–sea battlefield consumed Axis production before it reached the front lines, showing how Allied dominance in these domains shrunk Axis options, crushed their logistical capabilities, and crippled strategic flexibility. This prompt explores how wartime innovation, industrial mobilisation, and strategic targeting fused into a comprehensive air–sea campaign that ultimately dictated the outcome of the conflict.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

1. Air–Sea Super-Battlefield: The expanded war zone where Allied air and naval forces engaged Axis resources far from traditional land fronts.

2. Strategic Bombing: The aerial targeting of enemy industrial, logistical, and urban infrastructure to degrade war-fighting capacity.

3. Maritime Denial: Naval strategies aimed at preventing enemy access to critical sea lanes and supplies.

4. Attritional Air Warfare: Sustained campaigns to destroy enemy aircraft production, airfields, and pilots before battlefield engagement.

5. Mobility Control: The ability to restrict or deny movement of enemy forces and supplies through dominance of sea and air routes.

6. Material Attrition: The degradation or destruction of enemy equipment before deployment to operational fronts.

7. Superiority in Production: Allied industrial capability to outproduce Axis powers in war-essential materiel.

8. Tonnage War: The Battle of the Atlantic strategy focused on sinking Axis and protecting Allied shipping.

9. Pre-emptive Destruction: Destruction of enemy materiel before it could be used effectively.

10. Airframe Output: Aircraft production figures indicating industrial strength.

11. Operational Pause: A forced halt in land operations due to logistical collapse.

12. Synthetic Oil: A critical German resource targeted to impair fuel supply.

13. Combined Bomber Offensive (CBO): Joint Anglo-American strategic bombing campaign in Europe.

14. Naval Blockade: Use of naval power to isolate enemy economies.

15. Air Supremacy: Absolute control of the airspace to enable offensive and defensive freedom.

KEY POINTS

1. Rethinking Decisive Battles
O’Brien opens by rejecting the myth of the decisive land battle in WWII. He argues instead that most Axis equipment was destroyed before reaching any battlefield through the supremacy of Allied air–sea operations. This reframing upends the standard historiography that centres on battles like Stalingrad or Kursk.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 1

2. Industrial Output and Strategic Focus
The Allies, especially the United States, prioritised air and naval production from the outset. This focus created an enormous advantage in deploying bombers, aircraft carriers, and destroyers faster and in greater quantities than the Axis could match or counter.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 1

3. Mobility and the Super-Battlefield
The concept of a geographically expansive “air–sea super-battlefield” enabled the Allies to disrupt Axis logistics and supply chains far from combat zones. Control of movement—rather than territory—became the strategic pivot.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 2

4. Maritime Denial and the Battle of the Atlantic
By mid-1943, the Allies had decisively turned the Atlantic shipping war in their favour. Technological advances (e.g., radar, depth charges, codebreaking) and mass ship production overwhelmed the U-boat threat.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 7

5. Strategic Bombing and German Industry
The Combined Bomber Offensive devastated German production centres, particularly synthetic fuel, ball bearing factories, and aircraft assembly plants. The attrition of trained pilots and disruption of output were strategic rather than tactical effects.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Chs. 8–9

6. Destruction Before Deployment
O’Brien calculates that over half of Axis equipment was destroyed in transit or in non-operational zones, never reaching the front. This attritional logic meant Axis forces were constantly weakened before combat.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 2

7. Air Power over Land Gains
Air power was the decisive factor in Normandy, not ground superiority. Bombing cut German transport links and isolated frontline units, forcing piecemeal response and delaying reinforcements.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 9

8. Technological Disparity in Aircraft Design
Axis nations lacked the industrial flexibility to match the rapid innovation of Allied air forces. The failure to mass-produce effective long-range bombers or replace trained pilots compounded their strategic vulnerability.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 4

9. Japanese Industrial Collapse
American submarine and air strikes reduced Japanese merchant and oil shipping to critical lows by late 1944. Loss of mobility and fuel decimated Japan’s capacity for defensive or offensive war.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 10

10. Naval Aviation and Carrier Dominance
The Pacific War demonstrated the potency of carrier-based air power. US fast carrier groups annihilated Japanese naval aviation during the Marianas campaign and battles like Leyte Gulf.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 10

11. Command of the Air as Strategic Leverage
Control of airspace allowed the Allies to choose when and where to attack. This forced the Axis to be reactive and surrender initiative, a core dynamic O’Brien sees as determinative of victory.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 6

12. U-Boat Defeat and Strategic Logistics
Technological innovation and resource allocation crushed the U-boat threat. Once defeated, Allied supply lines became unassailable, ensuring vast transatlantic mobility.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 7

13. Destruction of German Fuel Infrastructure
By 1944, Allied bombers had eliminated most of Germany’s fuel processing capacity. Without fuel, tank divisions and air fleets were effectively immobilised.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 9

14. Air–Sea Power and Strategic Flexibility
Allied leaders, notably Roosevelt and Churchill, made early grand strategic choices favouring naval and air assets, allowing them to project power flexibly across multiple theatres.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Ch. 4

15. Conclusion: Control of Mobility = Victory
O’Brien concludes that war-winning power lay in the ability to restrict enemy movement, enforce material attrition, and dominate air and sea environments. It was this control of mobility, not land conquest, that determined victory.
Reference: O’Brien, 2015, Conclusion

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. O’Brien, P.P. (2015) How the War Was Won: Air-Sea Power and Allied Victory in World War II. Cambridge University Press.

   • Ch. 1: The dominance of air and sea production

   • Ch. 2: Equipment destruction before battlefield deployment

   • Ch. 4: Grand strategy and prioritisation

   • Ch. 6: Strategic air and sea warfare implementation

   • Ch. 7: Defeating the U-boat threat

   • Ch. 8: Strategic bombing and Germany 1943

   • Ch. 9: The European air–sea campaign, 1944

   • Ch. 10: Japanese defeat through maritime-air attrition

   • Conclusion: Supremacy through control of mobility