JB-GPTs - AP POST 06

JB-GPTs

AP 06: JB-GPT's AI TUTOR—1918: BATTLE OF HAMEL DEMONSTRATES AIR SUPPORT.

COMMENTS TO: zzzz707@live.com.au

Copy and paste everything on this page below this line, into the AI of your choice. Fill in or delete where indicated.

========================================================

AI INSTRUCTIONS

Preferred use references from: https://www.jb-gpt-prompts.com/jb-gpts-military-references
If additional references are used, they must be drawn from reputable and scholarly sources. These may include academic publications, books from established historians, official government documents, respected think tanks, and recognized academic institutions such as leading universities.
For follow-up question:
Provide 5 (or change number) numbered key points (40–60 words each), with author, book title, and chapter.
Add a separate Harvard-style bibliography.
Suggest 3 more follow-up questions.
Use clear language—no specialist jargon.

Follow-Up Questions (Delete those you don't use, or create your own e.g,, expand on key point four).

01. How did the Battle of Hamel redefine the role of air power within the framework of Combined Arms Manoeuvre?
02. In what ways did Monash’s integration of air, land, and logistics at Hamel anticipate later joint operational doctrines?
03. Why is the airdropped resupply at Hamel considered a doctrinal innovation in air–land integration and logistical agility?

1918: BATTLE OF HAMEL DEMONSTRATES AIR SUPPORT.

OVERVIEW:

The Battle of Hamel, fought on 4 July 1918, was a short, sharp victory that marked a turning point in modern military operations. Orchestrated by Lieutenant General Sir John Monash, it was the first time infantry, tanks, artillery, and aircraft were deliberately and synchronously combined into a single, integrated assault. The battle lasted just 93 minutes and demonstrated how carefully coordinated arms could achieve battlefield dominance with minimal casualties. Aircraft conducted reconnaissance, bombing runs, and even parachute resupply—highlighting air power's evolving support role. Hamel provided a clear demonstration of the principles of Combined Arms Manoeuvre (CAM), setting the pattern for later 20th-century operations across both land and joint domains.

GLOSSARY

01. Combined Arms Manoeuvre (CAM): The synchronized use of various combat arms—infantry, armour, artillery, air, and naval power—to achieve complementary and decisive battlefield effects.
02. Hamel (1918): A World War I battle where Australian-led Allied forces used coordinated tactics combining infantry, tanks, artillery, and aircraft.
03. Monash, John: Australian corps commander whose meticulous planning and integration of multiple arms at Hamel set a benchmark for future military operations.
04. Sopwith Camel: A British fighter aircraft used in ground attack, bombing, and reconnaissance roles during WWI.
05. Creeping Barrage: Artillery fire that advances in timed stages just ahead of friendly troops.
06. RFC/RAF: The Royal Flying Corps, renamed the Royal Air Force in April 1918, played a key role at Hamel.
07. Close Air Support (CAS): The tactical use of aircraft to assist ground troops in close proximity to enemy forces.
08. Battlefield Synchronization: The precise timing and coordination of different forces to maximise operational effectiveness.
09. Operational Innovation: The creation and successful implementation of new tactics, technologies, or concepts in warfighting.
10. Force Multiplication: Enhancing overall combat effectiveness by combining elements in ways that amplify each other's impact.

KEY POINTS

01. Monash’s Vision of Integration: General John Monash orchestrated the Battle of Hamel with a belief in integration and precision. He synchronized artillery, tanks, infantry, and aircraft into a time-sequenced assault. His emphasis on minimal casualties through planning and coordination anticipated future operational design frameworks in coalition warfare.
02. Air Power in a Tactical Role: Aircraft at Hamel supported the battle through bombing enemy lines, aerial reconnaissance, and logistics drops. This was one of the earliest uses of tactical air support in direct coordination with ground forces—highlighting the early formation of air–land integration principles.
03. Rapid Victory Through CAM: The entire battle lasted just 93 minutes. Tanks advanced with infantry behind a moving artillery barrage, while air attacks suppressed enemy positions. The integration of arms compressed the combat timeline and stunned German forces, showcasing the strategic power of operational tempo.
04. Airdropped Resupply Innovation: The RAF dropped ammunition via parachute to frontline troops during the battle—a military first. This innovation addressed the classic friction point of logistics, reinforcing the importance of agility and sustainment in future CAM frameworks.
05. Psychological Shock and Cohesion: The shock effect of multiple arms hitting simultaneously caused German confusion and collapse. The cohesion of CAM at Hamel not only broke enemy resistance but also preserved Allied morale—establishing psychological disruption as a core outcome of manoeuvre warfare.
06. Template for Future Campaigns: Hamel directly influenced later operations in the Hundred Days Offensive. Monash’s integration model demonstrated how coordinated force packages could break through static warfare and restore mobility—a lesson carried into WWII and beyond.
07. Air–Land Synchronization Precedent: The bombing and artillery barrages were deliberately timed with ground advances. This coordination foreshadowed future developments in joint fires, airspace deconfliction, and air–land battle planning seen in later 20th-century conflicts.
08. Coalition Command Effectiveness: Monash successfully integrated inexperienced American troops under Australian leadership. His ability to command across national lines, while executing CAM, highlighted leadership and interoperability as vital to modern coalition warfare.

Doctrinal Note on CAM (100 Words)
Combined Arms Manoeuvre (CAM) is not limited to land warfare. While its classic form involves infantry, armour, artillery, and engineers, modern CAM embraces joint integration—including air and maritime power. Aircraft can act as mobile artillery, ISR assets, or logistical links, while naval elements can deliver long-range fires, sea-based air support, or coastal envelopment. CAM aims to overwhelm adversaries by presenting them with simultaneous dilemmas across multiple domains. The Battle of Hamel was a prototype—aircraft acted as both strike and resupply elements, making it an early precursor to joint CAM as it would later be defined by NATO and Western militaries.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
01. Biddle, T.D. (2002) Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare. Princeton University Press.
02. Corum, J.S. (2022) Bloody April 1917: The Birth of Modern Air Power. Oxford: Osprey.
03. Meilinger, P.S. (2001) Airwar: Theory and Practice. London: Frank Cass.
04. Olsen, J.A. (ed.) (2010) A History of Air Warfare. Washington, DC: Potomac.
05. Stephens, A. (ed.) (2001) The War in the Air, 1914–1994. Maxwell AFB: Air University Press.
06. Olsen, J.A. (2017) Airpower Applied. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse